ANOTHER WOMAN IN MURDER CASE ; Prosecution Asks Henry Southworth, on Trial For His Life, a Num. ber of Pointed Questions as to His Relations With Other I ! Women Nightwatchman Who Saw Mrs. Lund and ; j Ned Hanks in Compromising Position. x ( j The Southworth murder tiial was resumed this morning in Judge llnr-i llnr-i Is court, It being the thirteenth day of the trial Just when tho case will be concluded Is still a matter of con-jectuie, con-jectuie, tho state claiming thai In rebuttal re-buttal at least two days' time will be taken. Then there may bo testimouy to offer on the part of the defendant t'i refute tho evidence juesentcd on rebuttal. Tlliiitc fir" Mthor a oonanMnTinl rliar acter are promised by the attorneys for the state, as was indicated this morning bj the questioning of the de-l(-.dant on cross-examination. The I state's attorney renewed the question i of Saturday which was withdrawn aft- er briet argument, and tho detenso I rjised no objection to It- The attor- neys for the defendant say that their client's character is an open book and that they are willing for the state to inquire into his character to the fullest full-est extent. The question put to Mr, Southworth tnis morning was whether the cause for divorco was other than that stated stat-ed by him in his previous testimony, intoxication, and further whether it was not true that he had taken a woman other than his wife to a rooming room-ing house In Salt Lake in the year 1910 and had remained at the house with her. Southworth was also asked whether he had not visited houses of ill-fame in 1910 and 1911. The witnesses wit-nesses stated emphatically that the Imputation was untrue and without It is expected" that tho defonse wui close its case this afternoon and the iutioduction of rebuttal testimony will begin immediately. The defendant was ill whon he on-toicd on-toicd the court room this morning and before he had finished his testimony testi-mony on cross examination and redirect re-direct questioning, he was soi.ed with an attack of nausea. A brief intermission inter-mission of the court was taken and Mr Southworth was given immediate attention by his friends. While it Is rumored that the state wlllintioducc testimony to disprovo the good reputation of the defendant, as testified to by a largo number of the leading men of Farmlngton, the defense promises a sensation alone the line of bribery charges. They slate that they have proof of an attempt at .bribery. This has not been intimated in-timated in court but It is talked quite ft eel y"by Mr. Suthworth's friends, who contend that parties have been unduly induced to testlfj against tae acienaant. His Only Love. On re-direct examination the defendant de-fendant said that JW) ra was his first and only love an dthat he had kept company with her two yeais before the were married. Mr. Southworth also said that he knew the reputation of "Ned" 'Hanks as a libertine and a dissolute man. Southworth's Character. In cross-examining tho defendant this morning, the question of Saturday, Satur-day, whether the differences between himself and wife had been occasioned occasion-ed hecauFo of his attentions to other women, was renewed by the state's attorney. The attorneys for the de-renfco de-renfco did not object Xo the question niwl tht witnncc nnewnrnil llmf Vi did not remember anything of that, kind, but qualified the ansvor b saying say-ing that a letter had been received intimating that question. When he returned from Nevada In August, he could not learn w'hy his ' i wife had renewed the divorce pro- I ceedlngB. i On August 10. he talked with Mrs, Southworth of tho terms of decreo of divorco. They had discussed ttuj question of alimony and attorney fees but be did ask her to prefer only a charge of drunkenness. Mr. Southworth denied that in 5910 he went to a rooming house In Salt Lake with a woman other than his wife, or that In 1910 and 1911 he visited disreputable and disorderly houses In Salt Lake City. The witness was oinphatic In his denial of the imputation. Reverting to the night of Aug. 12, the witness couid not remember that he visited Glenwood park and ho said he could not recall any of tho surroundings, nor what occurred that i night, except that he saw Mrs. South- worth, Mr. Hanks and Mrs. Lund ' coming toward him. ' . The defendant was unshaken in his ' testimony and he did not deviate from the story told on direct examination. ' ) (Continued on Page Seven.) S ? another woman 25 1 IN MURDER case "A i lto f (Continued from Page Six.) itjtjt ' 5fj . Seon by Nlghtwatchman. t fffSi ' Lawrence Pendleton, night watch.- Sjy man at Lagoon ln August of this year, i5UJ knew the Southworths and "Ned" '5l ! Hanks. He saw Mr Hanks and Mrs. 25? Henry Southworth and Mrs. Lund tffitf together In July, 1911 They were SSjS seated ln tho bowery at Lagoon, Mrs, 35 Lund and Mr Ilanks ,n a coral)r- 155: mlslng position. The band glasses ?5 ? and bottles there and it appeared JS ' as though they had been drinking. "55 Rebuttal Testimony. K 3 At this point tho defense rested and 5bJ tho state began the Introduction ot 5 rebuttal testimony, 'Mrs A. E. Eng- IfiS , strom of Farmlngton being the tirst vgLl 1 witness called S'no Is a neighbor bjfir of Heno Southworth On July 4. 1911, she was at Southworth's place al - picking berries and Mrs. Myra South-worth South-worth was there during tho afte noon It was testified b a witness for tho defense that Mrs.' Southworth Wis at Lagoon with "Ned" Hanks at 3: .10 o'clock that aftornoon The itness said Hanks was not at the party glvon' the Italians bv Mia Lund. She also said, that on the night when Mr Southworth was looking look-ing for his wife and when he found her and asked where "Ned" was. that Mrs. Southorth was with a man named nam-ed Andrews. At times Mrs. Southorth had asked ask-ed the wii-ess to keep an eye on tho . children. A email sensation was created In tho Southworth case Saturday afternoon after-noon when Attorney Hulaniskl for the state, on cross examination, asked Henry Southworth whether he was certain that drinking was the only grievance his wife had against him and whether that was the only reason rea-son fQr the divorce proceedings. Tho question was objected to by the attorneys at-torneys for the defense and tho Jury was excluded while tho legal phase of tho question was argued bv counsel. coun-sel. The state's attornoy contended that ho had the right to go Into all tho relationships of the husband and wife for tho past fow years, for It might be shown that the defendant had done other things more grievous than drinking, tho Insinuation being made that there were othor things more flArlnna tVinf rnnanri tho fllvtriA nrn. ceedlngs. In the argument against tho Introduction Intro-duction of tho testimony, Attornoy Halverson declared that ln Its great lengths, as partially Insinuated, the state might attempt to prove adultery or other crime against the defendant, but that it could not possibly bo material ma-terial In tho caso at bar nor could It have had any hearing regarding tho condition of tho defendant's mind when the homicide was committed. i Mr. Hulaniskl said that if such questioning were not allowed It would i bo lmposslblo to get a conviction against a man who had "killed another If he desired to drag his wife Into tho matter. Ho thought that such testimony testi-mony would tend to show that tho defendant acted ln a spirit of revenge. Tho court overruled the objection and the Jury -nas recalled. I Immediately after the Jury resumed I Its position In tho box, however, tho I state's attorney withdrew tho question ques-tion and tho court stated that an adjournment ad-journment would bo taken until Monday Mon-day morning Rumor was soon afloat that the differences dif-ferences between Mr. South-worth and his wife had been occasioned through his infldollty to her and that he had had questionable associations with other women. Both Mr. Southworth and his attorneys attor-neys and his friends at tho court room stated at the tlmo of tho recess of the court that the. Insinuation was absolutely without foundation and that It had been suggested by the half dozen people in Farmlngton who are not friendly to the defendant. A woman of prominence was mentioned men-tioned ln connection with the affair. oo